Tariff Impact: India vs U.S.
Clear, side-by-side note describing who was affected, real examples, short-term & long-term effects, and mitigation options.
At a Glance — Summary
A tariff escalation between the United States and India led to mutual losses: India faced export shocks (seafood, textiles, metals); the U.S. saw reduced farm sales (almonds, apples). Competitor countries gained market share.
Quick Impact Table
Who | India | U.S. |
---|---|---|
Farmers | Shrimp & seafood producers (Odisha): large income loss; rice & pulses exporters also hurt. | California almond & apple growers lost market share; reduced export earnings. |
Manufacturing | Textiles, gems, leather, certain auto components faced order drop; MSMEs hit. | Medical devices & electronics exporters lost access to Indian market. |
Metals | Steel & aluminium exporters lost competitiveness; regional hubs (Angul) affected. | U.S. importers paid more; some domestic producers temporarily protected. |
Workers | Processing plant layoffs (seafood & textiles) and fisherfolk livelihoods at risk (Odisha ~1.5M). | Farm labor & processing sectors faced lower demand, price volatility. |
Consumers | Higher prices for U.S. imports (nuts, wine, medical devices). | Higher prices for some Indian imports (textiles, rice); fewer choices. |
Detailed, Real Examples
- Shrimp & Seafood (Odisha): Export shipments collapsed (example: exporters cut containers from ~100 to ~25), price falls of ~₹20–30/kg; ~1.5 million coastal livelihoods affected.
- Almonds & Apples (U.S.): U.S. producers faced immediate loss of sales when India imposed retaliatory tariffs; later tariff removal restored access partially.
- Textiles & Gems (India): Orders moved to Bangladesh & Vietnam where tariffs were lower; MSMEs saw cash-flow pressure.
- Aluminium (Odisha): Angul-based producers lost sales to U.S. buyers; longer-term reorientation to alternative markets required.
These examples reflect both direct tariff impositions and secondary effects (buyers relocating orders, currency movements, and logistics disruptions).
Short-term vs Long-term Effects
Short-term (0–12 months)
- Immediate drop in export volumes to affected markets.
- Price volatility and inventory build-up for exporters.
- Layoffs and cash-flow stress for MSMEs and processors.
- Political pressure on governments to respond (retaliatory tariffs, subsidies).
Long-term (1–5 years)
- Market reorientation — buyers shift sourcing to lower-tariff countries.
- Investment decisions postponed or re-routed.
- Potential erosion of competitiveness if protection persists.
- Structural policy shifts: export diversification, trade agreements, and incentives.
Who Wins & Who Loses (Concise)
Losers
- Export-dependent workers & MSMEs in impacted sectors (seafood, textiles).
- Farms reliant on single export markets (almonds, apples).
- Consumers facing higher import prices.
Winners
- Competing exporters from Vietnam, Bangladesh, Ecuador, etc.
- Some domestic firms temporarily protected from foreign competition.
- Import-substitution sectors (short-run gains).
Policy Responses & Mitigation (India & U.S.)
- India: Temporary subsidies, interest-rate support for working capital, safeguard duties, export diversification schemes, finding alternate markets (EU, Middle East, SE Asia).
- U.S.: Relief & compensation for affected farmers (market promotion programs), diplomatic negotiations to remove retaliatory tariffs, targeted trade talks.
Both governments also used diplomatic channels to de-escalate and reopen markets — demonstrating tariffs are often followed by negotiation.
Practical Advice for Stakeholders
- Exporters: Diversify markets (EU, Middle East, ASEAN), upgrade product value, and negotiate long-term contracts with price-adjustment clauses.
- Farmers/Processors: Form cooperatives, access export finance, and add value (processing, cold-chain) to reduce price sensitivity.
- Policymakers: Provide short-term relief, accelerate trade negotiations, and invest in market intelligence & logistics.
No comments:
Post a Comment